https://dev.newlightera.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Quantum-Conscienceness.mp4
I had never heard of Quantum Jumping until February 3, 2024, when I YouTube’d: “Frequency” because I realized I had been hearing about vibrations and frequency without understanding what they were about. Eventually, I opened an YouTube video: “The most powerful frequency of God 963 Hz – countless miracles will spill throughout your life“. It sounded nice. Peaceful and etherial. But nothing to write a blog post about.
I kept listening for a hour or so. Then I noticed a change. There was a shift in my awareness. All of a sudden, I became joyful, excited, there was a sense of energy and focused peace. Without any cause. In trying to figure out what was going on. I came to understand that I had made a Quantum Jump in consciousness. All the distracting thoughts of noise and static ceased.
Now I am aware of two states of consciousness: 1) the static,noisy, distracted and stressful contradicting thoughts. Or 2) the state of joy, purpose, clarity, energy and focused peaceful innovation.
Since then, when I am stressed or need to concentrate, I goto NewLightEra.com and play the background music.
Quantum jumping is a concept rooted in quantum physics, suggesting that consciousness can transcend traditional physical boundaries and shift between different realities or states of being. It posits that through focused intention and visualization, individuals can access alternate versions of themselves in parallel universes, thereby unlocking new potentials and possibilities.
Solfeggio frequencies, on the other hand, are specific tones believed to have profound effects on human consciousness and brainwave patterns. These frequencies, such as those in the 396Hz to 963Hz range, are thought to correspond to different states of consciousness, emotions, and spiritual experiences. By listening to Solfeggio frequencies, individuals may entrain their brainwaves to resonate with these specific frequencies, inducing states of relaxation, focus, and heightened awareness.
The connection between Quantum jumping and Solfeggio frequencies lies in their shared goal of elevating consciousness and facilitating personal transformation. Just as quantum jumping seeks to shift consciousness to alternate realities, Solfeggio frequencies aim to alter brainwave patterns to align with higher states of awareness. By combining the power of focused intention with the sonic vibrations of Solfeggio frequencies, individuals may facilitate a quantum jump in consciousness, transcending limitations and accessing new realms of possibility.
Below is exellent explaination of Quantum Jumping that I really enjoyed:
Transcript of What Happens During a Quantum Jump?
Introduction
0:00Since the very beginning of quantum mechanics, a debate has raged about how to interpret0:04its bizarre predictions.0:06And at the heart and origin of that debate is the quantum jump or quantum leap – the0:10seemingly miraculous and instantaneous transitions of quantum systems that have always defied0:15observation or prediction.0:18At least, until now.0:24The notion of a quantum jump or quantum leap is one of the founding concepts of quantum0:27mechanics.0:28It’s really the OG of quantum weirdness – so much so that it’s become part of common0:32lexicon, with very loose fidelity to the original meaning.0:36It comes from the idea that electrons in atoms jump randomly and instantaneously from one0:40orbit or energy level to another, without ever occupying the intervening space.0:45The idea has become so ingrained into how we think about atoms that few think to question0:51the notion.0:52But one of the principal founders of quantum mechanics thought otherwise.0:56Erwin Schrodinger himself never accepted the idea of the quantum jump – but could also
Niels Bohr
1:01never prove it wrong.1:02That proof required precision measurements that didn’t exist in Schrodinger’s time.1:07However they exist now – and the reality of the quantum jump has finally been tested.1:12It all started back in 1913, when the great Danish physicist Niels Bohr set about to explain1:17emission spectra – the sharp bands of color produced when a simple tube of gas is energized.1:22He took a lead from the recent success of Max Planck, who in 1901 had managed to explain1:27the colors of light produced by a heated object – the so-called blackbody spectrum – by assuming1:33that light is made up of irreducible packets of energy that we now call photons.1:37Bohr placed a similar restriction on atoms – he required that electron energy levels1:43were quantized – could only have very specific energies that depended on the element.1:49Electrons would then jump between energy levels by emitting or absorbing a photon that corresponded1:54to the difference in energy.1:56The result was the Bohr model of the atom – the very first attempt at a quantum theory,2:01and it very neatly explained the specific frequencies of light observed in emission2:04spectra of hydrogen – although it failed for more complex elements2:09Bohr’s work inspired Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrodinger to develop the first complete2:14formulations of quantum mechanics in 1925.
Werner Schrodinger
2:18Ultimately, these successfully predicted the spectra of elements of any complexity – and2:23much more besides.2:25But one thing remained mysterious – what was actually happening during the quantum jump,2:31and what determined when a quantum jump would occur?2:34To address questions like this, Bohr and Heisenberg teamed up to develop the “Copenhagen interpretation”2:40of quantum mechanics.2:41Copenhagen describes transitions in quantum states as fundamentally random – the dice2:46are rolled, and the system transitions instantaneously.2:50The electron goes from one energy level to the other without moving in between.2:55Copenhagen says that “measurement collapses the wavefunction”, which these days is more3:00often taken to mean that interaction with the environment causes the state transition3:05- causes the quantum jump.3:07But one guy was not impressed by this idea – the inventor of the wavefunction himself,3:13Erwin Schrödinger.3:14When he visited Bohr’ home in 1926, Schrödinger said “If we are still going to have to put3:20up with these damn quantum jumps, I am sorry that I ever had anything to do with quantum
Are there quantum jumps
3:26theory.”3:27Schrödinger became bed-ridden with an illness during that visit – perhaps he was that sick3:30of the idea.3:32But it didn’t help – supposedly Bohr continued haranguing the poor sick man with the Copenhagen3:37world-view.3:38Bohr’s efforts were to no avail.3:40In 1952, Schrödinger published a two-part essay titled “Are there quantum jumps?”3:45wherein he compared the theory of quantum jumps to that of epicycles—the long dead3:50theory about the motion of the planets in an Earth-centered solar system.3:54He claimed that both epicycles and quantum jumps were “ingenious constructs of the3:59human mind” that nevertheless were not true descriptions of nature.4:04So why did Schrodinger hate quantum jumps so much?4:07Simply put, they seemed unnatural and unphysical – a hack added to cover up a phenomenon that4:13quantum theory could not yet properly explain.4:16The debate over quantum jumps was just one part of the larger discussion about the quantum4:21nature of reality.4:23It was the Copenhagen interpretation versus – well “not-Copenhagen”.
Not Copenhagen
4:27The most famous quote on the not-Copenhagen side was from Albert Einstein – “God does4:32not play dice with nature”.4:34It was a reaction against one of the central tenants of Copenhagen – that subatomic phenomena4:39are fundamentally random, or probabilistic.4:43But Schrodinger had his arguments too.4:45He believed it all came down to waves—and that nothing was particularly special about4:50these waves compared to any other kind of classical wave.4:54He argued that most “spooky” quantum phenomena could be explained by classical resonance5:00phenomena.5:01He rejected the idea of the “photon” as an irreducible energy packet, and even dismissed5:05the notion that electrons transitioned between discrete energy levels.5:10He argued that the same emission spectra could be got by thinking of these levels as fundamental5:15vibrational modes, like on a drum or guitar string.5:19An atomic electron could then be considered a superposition of multiple vibrational modes.5:24And that meant the electron could transition smoothly through a series of intermediate5:28states during each transition, rather than undergoing instantaneous quantum jumps.5:34To Schrodinger, a big part of the problem was that Bohr and others were using the behavior5:39of systems of many, many individual particles to infer the behavior of individual particles.5:44He believed that it was completely nonsensical to even think about single particles.5:49As he put it, “we never experiment with just one electron or atom.5:54In thought-experiments we sometimes assume that we do; this invariably entails ridiculous6:00consequences…”
Single Quantum Jumps
6:02That was in 1952 – and in 1952 we had never seen a single photon produced by a single6:08quantum jump in a single atom.6:11But in time we figured out how to do exactly that.6:15Fast forward 30 years.6:16By the 80s we’d learned how to trap and cool a single atom with lasers.6:21And in 1986, almost simultaneously, three different teams observed quantum jumps in6:26such an atom.6:27Here’s how it worked.6:28The single atom – in this case mercury or barium – is bathed in a laser beam with a6:33frequency exactly tuned to the energy difference between two of its electron levels – call6:39them 1 and 2.6:41If the electron is in level 1, it should jump to level 2 by absorbing a photon from the6:45laser light.6:46If the electron then falls back to level 1 it should emit an identical photon in a random6:51direction.6:52For the right choice of energy levels, this should happen extremely quickly – the electron6:55should become locked between the two levels.6:59In the 1986 experiments, the electron in the trapped atom jumped between levels something7:04like 100 million times per second.7:06The individual photons emitted in this process couldn’t be seen – instead the single atom7:11just glowed, or fluoresced.7:14This wasn’t a direct observation of individual quantum jumps – that required an extra level7:19of cleverness, as well as an extra energy level – we’ll call this level 3.7:25Level 3 is far more stable than level 2 – an electron that finds itself there may take7:30many seconds to drop back down.7:33So, we have our atom happily fluorescing in the original laser beam.7:37Now flash a second laser with frequency tuned to take the electron from level 1 to level7:423.7:43Suddenly the atom goes dark – the fluorescence stops, because the electron is stuck in level7:483 and no longer available to cycle between 1 and 2.7:52Then, after a period of time, the electron decays and fluorescence starts again.7:58In this way, physicists were able to gain fairly direct evidence of a single quantum8:01jump.8:02And the downward jumps when the electron decayed out of level 3 appeared to occur at completely8:07random times.8:08Just as Bohr had predicted.8:10So, that settled it.8:12Schrödinger was wrong and Bohr was right.8:14Right?8:15Not so fast.8:16Although the jump appeared random, there was no way to tell whether it was instantaneous,8:21or whether the electron passed through some intermediate states during the jump8:26Fast forward another 30+ years to, well, a year ago.8:30Technology has advanced to the point that we can not only see individual quantum jumps8:35- we can monitor their progress, and even interrupt them mid-jump.8:39Now this isn’t with an actual atom, but rather a sort of “artificial atom made of8:46two superconducting circuits.8:48The 3 different energy levels of this artificial atom corresponded to the number of electromagnetic8:53quanta of energy stored in the circuits.8:56The ground state (or state 1 using the notation from the previous experiment) corresponded9:01to zero quanta in either circuit, states 2 and 3 corresponded to 1 quantum in either9:08respective circuit.9:09They then placed these artificial atoms inside a microwave cavity – analogous to the laser,9:16which could cause the “atom” to transition between states.9:19But this also allowed the researchers to monitor the state of the system with far greater resolution9:25than in the 1986 experiment.9:28They could actually zoom in on a quantum jump and finally figure out whether it truly was9:34an instantaneous transition.9:35They found that … no, it was not instantaneous after all, but rather was a continuous transition9:43over intermediate states that took a few microseconds.9:47And that transition appeared to be perfectly described by theory – in this case quantum9:53trajectory theory.9:55But what about the randomness of the event?9:57Well, the spacing between events did appear to be random, as Bohr thought.10:02But just prior to each jump the system started to shift in a way that enabled the researchers10:08to predict the oncoming jump.10:11And that ability to predict also allowed them to reverse the quantum jumps midflight by10:16adjusting the microwave field during the process.
Quantum Zeno Effect
10:19Given that the quantum jump onset was predictable, and that its trajectory was extremely well10:24described by theoretical calculations, it’s tempting to wonder if the whole process is10:28driven by an underlying deterministic mechanism, rather than fundamental randomness.10:33I suspect both Schrodinger and Einstein would agree.10:37But what’s really going on here?10:40Well, just a couple of months ago, a group of theorists claim to have taken a major step10:45towards figuring it out.10:47They explain this non-instantaneous quantum transition in terms of something called the10:51Quantum Zeno Effect.10:54We’ll need a full episode to explain this phenomenon properly, but in short, the act10:58of measuring a system will, in Copenhagen terms, collapse the wavefunction, which drastically11:05changes how the system behaves – for example, trapping the system in one state.11:10The theorists showed how quantum states can transition very predictably through a series11:15of superposition states – much as Schrodinger proposed – but in addition to these predictable11:19quantum jumps there are fundamentally unpredictable ones–truly unpredictable and sudden quantum11:23jumps that would’ve made Bohr proud.
Conclusion
11:26And the difference?11:27It’s to do with how strongly the system is coupled to the measurement apparatus.11:31The weaker the measurement, the less likely a true quantum jump is to occur.11:35But more on that another time.11:37For now, both the Bohr and Schrodinger camps have new evidence in their favour.11:44For the longest time, physicists have shied away from asking which interpretation of quantum11:48mechanics is correct.11:50It’s considered by many to be a point of philosophical preference whether you roll11:54dice with Bohr and Heisenberg in Copenhagen, or ride the continuous and deterministic wave12:00of Schrodinger and others.12:02But experimentalists are proving far cleverer than the naysayers imagined.12:06Nearly a century after Bohr and Schrodinger started the argument, we may be on the verge12:10of the next quantum leap – to learning whether quantum jumps are instantaneous or continuous,12:16and perhaps even whether the quantum world is built upon fundamentally random processes,12:22or is driven by rigidly deterministic mechanic of space time.English